admin

 

For those businesses that rely on internet marketing to boost their sales and build their brand (which is most), you may have noticed a recent decrease in your site ranking on Google. No, this isn’t simply because you forgot to update your keywords or you forgot to pay for your links, it’s actually because of something that Google did! A recent Penguin update issued by the internet giant has caused internet marketers to make changes to the way that businesses draw their audience to their sites, otherwise, they will be left behind, in a sense.

What was the Google Penguin Update?

Periodically, you will find that in attempt to weed out the duplicate sites, spam or even those sites which are not quality, search engines will produce a new algorithm for identifying content to display. This updated algorithm, known as Penguin, was geared toward eliminating unethical backlinks, while helping to improve the ranking of those sites that are legitimately optimized for search engines.

The goal of the Google Penguin update was not necessarily to punish hardworking business owners and those that have personal sites, rather to make Google a more optimal search engine for its users.

Why Should I Care About the Google Penguin Update?

As business owner it is important to recognize that Google is one of the most popular search engines utilized by Americans today. That means that a large percentage of your target consumers and audience utilize Google to find your business website and connect with you, so if your business site is not optimized to the standards that the most recent Google update has set forth, it won’t be seen.

This update means that you, or your internet marketing company, must start paying closer attention to the SEO techniques that your business uses, and the way that you implement them into your site. For those businesses that do not take note of the specifications and changes that the Penguin has made to the way that you optimize your site, it will certainly affect your ranking and ultimately your business could suffer. That’s why you should care about this update!

For any business professional who has a website, or relies on their site for traffic to their business, it is important to update your website according to the new Google standards, especially if you want to maintain, or exceed, the ranking that you once had.

 

 

The domination of mobile Internet browsing is practically on the rise. With almost all new devices and gadgets nowadays being made Internet-capable, people are given the privilege and convenience of accessing the Web through their mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. This is the reason why all website owners should consider the possibilities and options tied to this trend. If you are an owner of a business or company that rely on Internet marketing, it would be best to look into how you can cater to the consumers who exploit the advantage offered by mobile browsing.

There are a number of factors that a website owner should look into if he or she wants to make the most out of the opportunity presented by mobile web browsing. One of the primary considerations that must be looked into is whether to opt for a responsive web design or build a separate mobile website. If you are making do of a tight budget as well as limited resources and personnel, you are probably eyeing a responsive web design as the best option available. But if you are to look deep within the advantages of getting a separate mobile website, you may decide otherwise.

But before you finally get into a conclusion, here’s a quick rundown of what’s in it for you if you pick a responsive web design over a separate mobile website, or vice versa.

What is Responsive Web Design?

Responsive web design is a relatively new concept and trend in the web design industry. Basically, this web design practice makes a particular website “respond” according to the screen size of the device where it is being accessed from. For instance, if a website is accessed using a cellular phone, one can view the website as it is when you view it via a computer. It will seem as if it was shrunk, and for one to be able to browse around the site conveniently (to be able to read the texts and click on the commands, tabs and links), he or she must zoom it in and slide or scroll down, up, left and right for a better and clearer view.

What is Separate Mobile Website?

As the title says, it is a separately built website that is meant for mobile device web browsing. It follows a different coding and programming principle and etiquette, one that is specifically made for mobile browsing. These mobile websites are made to ensure that the websites are compatible and accessible in most, if not all, Internet-capable mobile devices.

Now, to responsive web design or to separate mobile website?

Choosing to get a separate mobile website or not is governed by several factors, but the decision definitely boils down to your business needs.

To help you decide, the first factor that you should look into is context. There are different reasons why users would access a website through their mobile devices instead of simply powering on their computers. Unless your website is a social media site, you should think of the reasons why your typical website visitor would access your website. Thus, you might wish to have a separate mobile website that only offers content and pages that are normally accessed by mobile browsers.

Next consideration is the content. If your desktop website has a lot of content, it is likely that a mobile device and mobile browser may have difficulty in loading. Mobile Internet connectivity is basically slower than broadband connection. Mobile browsers are also normally slower than their desktop versions. Thus, it may be more practical to get a separate mobile website that offers nothing but the necessary details and content that are typically needed by mobile users.

Finally, the last but not the least important consideration is the current situation of your website or business. If you think you have a good readership and traffic coming from mobile users, it may be best to offer them something special. Moreover, if you are satisfied with how your responsive website is doing when accessed via mobile, then getting a separate mobile website can just be saved for later. Furthermore, if you think there is nothing else you can eliminate or change in your current website, it may be better to leave it as it is.

Bottom line is: you should know your business and website’s needs, as well as the preferences of your audience. You should also consider your budget and resources and if you are running on a tight one, see if your website can still perform well when accessed through mobile even if it runs on a responsive web design.

 

By Dorina Marie Elumbaring

I. Introduction

Everyone knows that the #1 spot on Google is where every website wants to be but not everyone knew how significant it is to be ranked there compared to being just #2. Close spot it is but based on statistics, there is more than 50% Click-through rate with the site in top 1 compared to top 2 sites.

A website on page 1 of Google will get around 20 times more traffic than a website on page 2 of Google, and 50 times more traffic than a site on page 3 of Google. If you are on page 4, you may as well be on page 100. Most searchers just don’t bother to go past the first page and in fact many don’t bother to go past the first 5 results.

II. Objective

Generally, this paper presents the effectiveness of Google Result Positioning.

Specifically this aims to:

· to raise awareness of the importance and value of SEO

· to help motivate businesses and individuals to optimize their web presence

· to encourage top ranked websites to improve the quality of their sites in an attempt to protect and improve upon their current rankings (and thus improve the quality of the web as a whole)

III. Google as Number 1 SERP

As shown in this image from Search Engine Land, most internet traffic rating services show Google to have 70% to 80% of the U.S. search market. Given the data below, it is no surprise that advertiser spend at large SEM companies are aggressively focused on Google.

 

Image1

I. Value of Google Result Positioning

It’s critical for websites to appear on Page 1 of Google, especially in one of the top three organic positions, as these spots receive 58.4% of all clicks from users, according to a new study from Optify.

With the case of ifultech’s site, www.ifultech.com, a SEO/Web design Company. Statistics shown below that as the ranking goes up, number of clicks and visits also increases.

image2

 

image3

 

image4

Websites ranked number one received an average click-through rate (CTR) of 36.4 percent; number two had a CTR of 12.5 percent; and number three had a CTR of 9.5 percent. Being number one in Google, according to Optify, is the equivalent of all the traffic going to the sites appearing in the second through fifth positions.

Here’s Optify’s look at CTRs on the top 20 sites:

image5

image6

Basically, Optify concludes that moving up to the top spot in Google from second or third could triple visits to your website.

Optify’s study of U.S. Google search engine results pages, conducted in December 2010, analyzed organic keyword visits for B2B and B2C websites. Optify analyzed data from 250 randomly chosen sites and an initial set of 10,000 keywords.

Here are some of Optify’s other findings.

Importance of Page 1

image7

The average CTR on Page 1 of Google was 8.9 percent, but the average CTR on Page 2 was 1.5 percent. Ranking first on Page 2 had a slight benefit over ranking in the last spot on Page 1 (2.6 percent vs. 2.2 percent CTR).

Optify concludes that, because predicting which position your site will appear in Google is basically impossible, your SEO efforts should first focus on getting on Page 1, and then on investing in working your way up to one of the top three spots. Also, ranking beyond Page 2, while good for tracking trends, has almost no business value, Optify noted.

I. Worth of Top Spot in Google

Optify looked at organic CTR in the hopes of updating one of the SEO industry’s long-time ROI calculators based on AOL’s leaked search records from August 2006, which Optify calls "old and dated," due to the evolution of universal search and integration of social search in recent years.

AOL’s data showed websites ranked first received 42.3 percent of traffic; second place got 11.92 percent; and third place had 8.44 percent:

image8

Image via Red Cardinal

AOL’s data was based on 19,434,540 click-throughs, whereas Optify’s was based on 1,224,383. Optify isn’t the first using AOL’s data as a benchmark. Last May, two studies aimed to calculate Google’s organic CTR.

Neil Walker’s study, using Google Webmaster Tools data from 100 clients and 2,710 keywords, found position one gets 46.37 percent of organic click-throughs; position two gets 29.43 percent; and position three gets 19.81 percent:

image9

Chitika’s study, which Jonathan Allen covered in "How Much is a Google Top Spot Worth?" reported that a top spot gets 34.35 percent of impressions; second position gets 16.96 percent; and third gets 11.42 percent. Chitika’s numbers were based on a sample of 8,253,240 impressions across its advertising network.

image10

While the exact figures and data sets vary from study to study, they all confirm that ranking at the top of Page 1 on Google continues to be incredibly valuable. One of Optify’s final pieces of advice is to stay on top of SEO best practices and strategies. That’s something you can do by regularly reading Search Engine Watch’s Search Engine Optimization section.

 

 

I. Organic CTR by CPC

Otpify also tested the effects of the CPC (cost-per-click) value of a keyword on its CTR, comparing "expensive" CPC terms, over $1.50 CPC on AdWords, with "cheap" CPC terms, under $0.25 CPC on AdWords.

On page No. 1, position No. 1, expensive CPC terms register a lower organic CTR on position No. 1 than cheaper terms, 30% vs. 20%. In addition, cheap CPC terms will likely yield over double the CTR on the first page than expensive CPC terms:

image11

For example, given two keywords with the same search volume where one is a cheap keyword and the other an expensive one, potential organic traffic is over 2 times greater on the cheaper CPC term.

I. Head Terms Vs. Long Tail

High-volume, more generic, head terms, (those with over 1,00 monthly searches (Google US)) perform differently than low-volume, more specific, long-tail terms (less than 100 monthly searches (Google US)).

For example, average CTR for head terms at position No. 1 is 32%, compared with 25% for long-tail terms:

image12

Long- tail terms, however, deliver better overall CTR on page No. 1 (4.6% average CTR for head terms vs. 9% average CTR for long-tail terms):

image13

The results suggest that if a brand is optimizing for head terms, it won’t likely register huge benefits until it reaches the top few positions. Brands that optimize for long-tail terms, however, can register relatively strong CTR almost anywhere on the first page, and there is less incremental benefit of moving up search results.

I. Conclusion

The benefits of ranking on the first search-engine results page (SERP) are more valuable than ever: 60% of clicks are generated by the top three SERP results, while the average CTR (click-through rate) for the top spot is 36.4%. It is therefore worth a ton – double the traffic of the 2nd to be precise.

When clients’ website reached the first page specially the top 3 spots, probability of being clicked, visited as well generate sales is far way better than any other rank on the search engines. In return, clients’ goal of being on the first which is to have their return on investment (ROI) is measurable, achievable, realistic and time specific.

Dorina Marie Elumbaring is an Internet Marketing Strategist for Creative Frappe Internet Marketing Solutions.

 

Even for established web development companies and businesses in web design, Reading, PA the wide world of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) can be quite confusing. There are so many available strategies and a plethora of marketing techniques that claim to be the solution to raising your website’s rankings and visibility, thereby ideally increasing your opportunities for income and profit.

Two of these techniques are link wheels and link pyramids. Considered rather “old school” compared to the newer SEO methods, the use of both link wheels and link pyramids seemed to have declined since 2009, but there are still companies offering SEO services in these areas for website owners who want to consider the option. In the interest of exploring all SEO schemes that may help website owners, developers and web design, Reading, PA, here’s a brief lowdown on both link wheels and link pyramids.

Link Wheels

link wheel

Link wheels, especially when first introduced, were hailed as highly effective means of improving your website rankings. The basic idea behind a link wheel is to use Web 2.0 sites to build links leading back to your main website. These Web 2.0 platforms allowed people to publish their own stuff then add links that browsers could follow, putting the main website at the “hub” of the link wheel. In turn, these Web 2.0 sites are likewise linked to each other, forming a closed loop or a wheel, which is where the name comes from.

The immediate advantage of the link wheel is the sudden increase it generates in website rankings. These Web 2.0 sites are already rated high on search engines, so the idea is to use this popularity as leverage for other individual websites. The best way to take advantage of the link wheel is to come up with relevant and excellent content in order to enhance readership and hopefully gain a following. In addition, if you can submit the RSS feeds of these Web 2.0 sites to RSS aggregators, your website can get indexed faster. Using social bookmarking and article directories are also ways to get the link wheel spinning faster to your advantage.

The downside to link wheels is that search engines have wised up to this method and in 2009, Google started to de-index articles that looked spun and didn’t have enough content. Additionally, WordPress now removes short blogs with more than two backlinks on them. With these, sites that relied heavily on link wheels began seeing drops in ranks. But since they are still able to function for SEO purposes, hybrid versions of the link wheel are still in use, with software like SENuke, Magic Submitter or EVO2 available to help automate the process for web design, Reading, PA.

Link Pyramids

link pyramid

Link pyramids are a spin-off of link wheels. The idea behind link pyramids is not to leave a trail as obvious as link wheels do, so that backlinking activity or other similar relationships between sites in this SEO technique are not easily detectable by search engines. Building a “natural” pyramid is the best way to maximize link pyramids in order to drive more traffic towards individual websites.

Link pyramids use a structure composed of base links, mid-grade or mid-level links and high-quality links or links with the most authority. Links that form the base of the pyramid are those that are “basic,” such as those on social networking and bookmarking sites, article sites, blog comments and other “lower-quality” links that search engines expect websites to have. Mid-level links are those that are not considered big authorities but still have some clout, like sites that re-publish articles from article directories. The links that form the uppermost tier of the pyramid are those that are deemed highly authorized on certain topics, or are considered credible sources by search engines.

There are more complex link pyramids made up of more levels or tiers and even branch out, but it’s up to you as a website owner to decide which SEO technique to use. In the end, whichever you go for, be reminded that you goal is to get the word out on your business or company in the best way possible for web design, Reading, PA!

 

Search results over major search engines are now not calculated as they were a few years back. In the past couple of years search engine results have stopped being comprised only of traditional matches. As far as Google is concerned, it has started including images, videos, maps, social profiles and much more into its search results. These factors now have a very strong impact on the search results provided by search engines.

Here are some great tips that will help you optimize your website for most modern SEO requirements.

Local SEO: Google usually includes a significant number of Google places listings in its search results. Whether you like it or not, these results are going to influence the visitors too. A significant number of them are going to navigate on these links. Further, if your business is spread locally then having a spot in the Google places is highly essential for you. This can be easily done by using:

  • Citations
  • Google Places Page Optimization
  • Reviews

Social Optimization: Social media channels have a huge impact on search results now. You cannot simply just ignore social networks such as twitter, Facebook, Google+ etc. Make sure that your search engine optimization campaign has a solid and effective social aspect associated with it. Try making proper use of twitter shares, Facebook likes, Google +1’s and social bookmarkings.

Keywords should be user optimized, not Robots: No doubt that robots play an important part in search results but Keyword optimization should be done according to the people who use search engines. You should know that people usually have a question in their mind when they search on the internet. Try to anticipate the most relevant questions that your potential clients may have in their mind when they search for services or products offered by you. Stop thinking of keywords as just data elements and think from the perspective of internet surfers.

High Quality Content Links: If you believe that you can somehow fool Google with paid or spam links then you are clearly mistaken and in for a lot of trouble. Content is the king and you should start treating it with respect. Good content writers are rare and you should make sure that you have a few who can provide original and informative content for your website and other purposes. Further, focus on guest blogging to blogs that are not a direct match to your industry.

Rely on KPIs: Personalized searches and private searches have made it essential to rely on simple key performance indicators (KPIs) rather than just focusing on ranking reports of keywords. Make proper use of Google Analytics and focus on aspects such as the number of landing pages, bounce rate of these pages, keywords that are driving traffic onto these pages etc.

The above mentioned tips would be very helpful in your search engine campaigns. However, for best results you can always hire a reputed and experienced web development company having proven capabilities in SEO and internet marketing as they would have many more tricks and expert professionals with them.

About Author:

Amy Patrix is an industry expert currently working in Xicom technologies, a renowned software development company and mobile application development company, as a subject matter expert for SEO and web based services. In his spare time, Amy likes to read novels and write blogs on informative topics.

 

 

There’s a buzz surrounding the news that came out during a recent CSS Working Group meeting: Microsoft, Mozilla and Opera have voiced their support for –webkit prefixed CSS properties and intend to make their own browsers Webkit friendly. The issue has been met with a lot of apprehension and chagrin by web developers in Reading, PA and everywhere else in the virtual world.

 

The reason behind this decision comes from the fact that mobile websites have been focusing on browsers based on Webkit, such as Safari, Chrome, iOS, Android and Nokia browsers. This basically means that Microsoft, Mozilla and Opera need to add support for –webkit if they want to keep up with the other mobile browsers else they’ll be relegated to the background. The minutes from the CSS Working Group Meeting has shown that browser vendors who are on Webkit are those getting the preferred mark-up.

 

Web developers in Reading, PA as with other developers have expressed their concerns on the issue. One of the primary points is that Webkit seems to be looming in dominance, like IE6 did in years past. There is the fear that this engine that powers those mobile browsers will become the widely-established standard instead of merely an option or, calling it for what it is, an experiment. Web developers foresee that encouraging the –webkit prefixes will adversely affect websites, as for example when Mozilla Firefox presents a website’s feature differently from Google Chrome.

 

Another reaction coming from all over the net is that web developers have become lazy, using and supporting Webkit instead of building cross-browser applications. In a post from the CSS Working Group Co-Chair Daniel Glazman, he persuades other browsers not to support the use of –webkit prefixes but instead come up with ways to support all browsers properly and put in other vendor prefixes for features that use –webkit. This even if it means multiple vendors declaring for one item.

 

Various solutions have been proposed from different areas in order to hopefully prevent these scenarios from playing out and Webkit from being an indispensable tool. One is the suggestion voiced by Glazman. Another is to limit the support for the –webkit prefix by restricting it to beta versions until its life span plays out, or ask vendors to create their own methods of implementing features in order to cope. Aaron Gustafson from the Web Standards Project has prompted a petition asking the three mentioned browsers, Microsoft, Mozilla and Opera not to push through with their plans to support –webkit prefixes. Gustafson has likewise come up with a means to double-check that a specific code is supporting other browsers using a one-line bash script.

 

Ifultech and others are sure that the sudden increase in Webkit support spells nothing but disaster, it is still up to developers everywhere to make sure that this does not happen. As Mozilla’s Christian Heilman has stated, the current situation is partly due to developers’ making a mess of things, so in turn, it is their responsibility to fix it as well.

 

Google has long been one of the most dominant names in the worldwide web; anything this giant does, from the seemingly insignificant to the groundbreaking, will always start a chain reaction and its after-effects be felt everywhere the internet is available, whether it is for companies doing web design in Reading, Pa or random online browsing in Oslo, Norway.

 

Matt Cutts of Google has released major news regarding Google’s above-the-fold algorithm update: as of the third week of January, 2012, Google has initiated an algorithm change that checks the amount of content and ads “above-the-fold” on a website. According to Cutts’ statement, sites that have gone overboard with ads and are deemed lacking in content will be penalized but on the upside, only 1% of websites will actually be adversely affected. He said that this is in response to heavy complaints from users who expect quality content upon clicking on a website, but instead are bombarded with ads and have to navigate through a tangle of these before finally reaching the content they initially searched for. In an effort to make user experiences better and more efficient, Google seeks to minimize the volume of such intrusive ads.

 

Ifultech, a Reading Pa web design firm, gets the idea of “above-the-fold” from the printed newspaper that refers to the top half of the page. According to studies, it is this portion that first draws a reader’s eye and holds attention, therefore it is here where the biggest headlines, the splashiest photos and in the case of websites, the most explosive ads are put in order to maximize readership or online time.

 

This new information from Google has left mixed reactions from both sides of the web. In lay-out and web design,  specialists and web owners have long relied on above-the-fold advertising to bring in more web traffic and as an effect, thoroughly cash in on their established sites. Though Cutts has said that only 1% will be affected, a lot of website owners and those in SEO have expressed concern that their rankings and ratings have dropped significantly since Google imposed the aforementioned algorithm. In addition, owners and experts have stated their annoyance at the lack of quantifiable standards regarding what Google considers “too many ads or too much ad space,” if there is a specific resolution that determines where the above-the-fold mark really is, how Google intends to determine which are ads and which ad networks are being targeted.

 

On the other hand, this news is heralded with a breath of relief from online users. In various reactions to posts related to Google’s algorithm change, users say that it would be good not to be forced to see dozens of ads upon immediately opening a website and it would make the browsing experience yield more satisfactory results in less time. Cutts has additionally cleared the issue on “too much ads” by explaining that the algorithm looks at ad space and how it is utilized, not the number of ads.

 

In light of this, our SEO specialists are now encouraged to make certain their work is not just customer-centered but user-friendly as well in order to avoid whatever penalties over stuffing websites with ads might entail. In the end, it’s the millions of online users that matter.

 

Although CSS grid systems can significantly simplify website development, a few problems arise when using these as a tool.

Traditionally, CSS grid frameworks have not allowed for a full separation of presentation and mark-up. To use a grid system, it is necessary to add .grid_x CSS classes to HTML elements, which results in a mixture of presentation and semantic information in an HTML document.

 

Another problem with CSS grid frameworks is the complications that arise when working with fluid percentages. Although grid systems provide the opportunity to work with fluid percentages, when nested columns are introduced, the percentages must all be recalculated.

Finally, although new tools are being created to assist users to change a page’s layout based on device or screen size, grid systems are not responsive.

But now, thanks to LESS CSS, traditional CSS can be extended with impressive new features such as operations, functions, variables and mixins.

The improvements that LESS brings to CSS lay the groundwork for a new innovative approach to building page layouts. This approach, called the Semantic Grid System can be either fixed or fluid, is semantic, is responsive and permits the number of columns and column widths to be altered instantaneously straight into the style sheet.

 

Now with LESS it is possible to specify a variable just once, and use it again through the style sheet by defining variables. Traditionally, to simply change the color in style sheets, it was necessary to utilize long selectors all dedicated to that single color. With LESS, you are able to specify variables in one place then reuse the variables in another place in the style sheet.

 

When using variables, it is often necessary to reuse more than single values. Repeating this type of code can add up quickly if you use a lot of CSS3. LESS offers a solution to this problem by permitting you to reuse whole classes by referencing them in your rule sets. These reusable classes, called mixins, are able to be manipulated by variables, and grouped into separate bundles by nesting them inside a rule set.

 

Unlike traditional CSS, as a way to show hierarchy, LESS lets you nest rule sets within other rule sets. With LESS, it is not necessary to repeat selectors repeatedly, all you have to do is nest the pertinent rule inside of another to designate the hierarchy. Also, it is a fantastic way to keep your code ordered and organized because visually, it groups related items together.

 

Additionally, multiplying, dividing adding and subtracting values and colors are now possible using operations. Finally, learning LESS is easy because it already uses existing CSS syntax. That way, if you are in doubt, you can always fall back to CSS.

 

Responsive Web design techniques aim to automatically change the size and layout of a user’s screen, based on information sent by the user’s Web browser. Using responsive design techniques, Web designers can optimize their content for various screen resolutions and devices. Although this design tactic has existed for a long time, it has become prominent as a way to accommodate the growing number of mobile smartphone and tablet devices.
Web design Reading Pa clients want their websites to display properly on any device, regardless of screen size or resolution. In the past, this was easy because of the limited number of screen types. Now designers must decide between creating a different version of their pages for every conceivable device and creating a single design that dynamically adapts to the user’s environment.
Responsive Web Design: Pros
Attractive features of responsive web design make it an appealing approach for several reasons. A few of them are listed here.
A single solution.
Grid layout systems, image optimization, and CSS pages all play a role in responsive Web design. Their dynamic nature means they can adapt to any screen or window size and resolution. This means that most jobs need only one design.
Future proof.
Responsive Web designs can manage unknown future screen sizes and resolutions without requiring future revision. This eliminates the need for expensive and tedious revisions later on.
A consistent look.
Users access the same URL from different devices and still have a pleasing experience. Similarly, users can share URLs with people using devices.
Resizable.
Screen and window sizes and resolutions can change in real time, changing the presentation of a Web page. Responsive designs adapt to almost any configuration, providing a consistent look and feel.
Responsive Web Design: Cons
Despite its robust benefits, responsive Web design may not be the best solution for every job. Here are a few reasons why some people should choose traditional Web designs.
Complexity.
The complex nature of responsive Web design means projects take longer to complete. Also, this design approach requires skilled designers who could dramatically increase the cost of a project.
Browser compatibility.
As designers use responsive design tactics to adapt to carrying user requirements, browsers are still evolving to accommodate CSS3 and HTML5. This means that compatibility issues can arise among the various popular browsers. In the end, designers may need to accomplish the same results with different techniques.
Page load speed.
The extra server calls responsive designs need can make pages take longer to load, especially on mobile platforms. Images can also load slowly as they are resized.
Different objectives.
Sometimes designers need to serve functional pages to mobile platforms while reserving the full website experience to desktop browsers. When objectives differ depending on the client device, designers must produce separate versions.
As the boom in mobile Web browsing continues, however, the need to adapt content to multiple devices becomes more urgent. Although the majority of business owners should consider responsive Web designs, some may not benefit from that approach. A consultation with a Web design Reading Pa firm can help businesses decide which approach to take.

 

In this digital age, a successful business must have a polished, functional website. Customers and clients often form their first impressions of a company through visiting its website. When it comes to web design, business owners will achieve the most benefits by hiring a firm that uses the latest technology available. Currently, html5 and css3 are two of the most significant technologies that are offered by the most up-to-date firms like the web design reading pa firm ifultech.
The benefits of html5 and css3 are many. Most importantly, they both offer greater complexity and flexibility in site design than their previous versions. With html5, it is now possible to employ Javascript to draw diagrams, dynamic animations, and graphics that would either have been impossible or highly labor-intensive with older technologies. Similarly, css3 allows for streamlined rules to be sent to the browser so that it generates graphics, animations, and rotations in real time. This functionality greatly reduces load time and requests to the server. Therefore, it can help reduce costs on high-traffic websites.
Another major benefit of both of the latest technologies is the ability to seamlessly integrate various forms of audio and video into websites. These technologies also allow for a company’s website to look great on a wide range of mobile devices. With more and more customers accessing the web from their smart phones and tablets, site designs must allow for dynamic resizing of images and graphics based on the specific device in a customer’s hand. Older technologies that produce wonderful results on a desktop computer often end up looking highly unprofessional on a mobile phone. Luckily, the newest technologies include efficient solutions for multiple screen sizes and operating systems. In the hands of an experienced designer, beautiful sites that work well on all types of devices can be cost-effectively created.
The above advantages and the use of HTML5Boilerplate, not only lead to interactive, modern websites, but they also reduce web design costs because designers can achieve more in less time. Effects that used to require meticulous creation in separate graphics programs can now simply be coded directly into the site with a few lines. When it takes less time to do something, the savings get passed on to the customer. Also, a budget that only went so far before can suddenly achieve much more.
Design firms like the Reading Pa web design company ifultech remain at the top of the game because they realize the importance of adopting the latest design technologies as soon as they are available. They never allow themselves to become complacent in a world where technological advancement happens at lightning speeds.

© 2012 Ifultech Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha